Apathy

TalkPolitics on PR: Reform is Long Overdue

TalkPolitics on PR: Reform is Long Overdue

“Here at TalkPolitics we are utterly devoted to free speech and democracy. No matter what the subject, we want as many voices as possible to be involved in the conversation. However, when it comes to the British public being able to freely express their views, they are faced with a huge obstacle that rarely gets talked about: the United Kingdom’s outdated, undemocratic voting system.”


TalkPolitics is proud to be supported by Audible. For 50% off your new membership, click here.

The youth vote dishevelled the Conservatives, but we haven’t finished yet

Adam_Bradford By Adam Bradford, social entrepreneur and Queen’s Young Leader

Note: views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of TalkPolitics.

A whopping 72 per cent of young people aged 18-24 voted in the General Election. It was a game changer. Hot off the heels of the EU Referendum I know that myself and my peers rallied round each other to register to vote this year.

I think last year many of us felt like voting in any capacity would be underwhelming and in many ways surpassed by the older generation who had the majority over us. When Brexit hit and the decision wasn’t what we had hoped, we realised we needed to make a difference next time we had a chance.

It is clear that Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour party won the youth vote. Every young person I have spoken to this week has cited biased media coverage, boredom at the Conservatives and a wish to see change in the way politics works in Britain.

A vote for Labour was a vote for change – Corbyn’s refreshing, human-level narrative appealed to young people, alongside his youth friendly policies. I do not agree with all of them but I am grateful he made space in his campaigning for young people. It was politics I could relate to, at least.

Now, we have a hung Parliament and an arrangement with the DUP. Who are the DUP? What will this arrangement cost us? What implications will it have? I am extremely unsure and know young people are still a little confused too. We have made our voices heard with our votes but we will not stop here. We will hold politicians to account, exercise our campaigning and voices to make sure we are properly represented and that our votes were not cast in vain.

Theresa May is our leader, but the make-up of our Parliament represents Britain now more wholly – a country perhaps undecided, a little divided, but longing for change. Keep your ears to the ground politicians, the next generation are becoming more and more politicised.

N.B. Post-publishing, this piece was subsequently moved to the 'Be A Voice' section.


TalkPolitics is proud to be supported by Audible. For 50% off your new membership, click here.

TalkPolitics Report: We Aren't Ready for Remote E-Voting

  cropped-final-logo1.png

By Managing Director Matt Gillow

 

 

TalkPolitics believes wholeheartedly in modernising Westminster.

In our increasingly digital, technological age – we believe that archaic practices are losing their place. Whilst tradition will always be important, it seems sentimental, and arguably naïve, to protect outdated systems and quirks when technology means we can be more efficient, more proactive, and simply more democratic.

 

There are many who agree with us. It’s why the question of e-voting, or rather, remote digital voting, has raised its head for consideration. Giving voters, whom are becoming more technologically literate (and busier) by the day, another channel through which to voice an opinion, seems like a logical next step.

 

So why not make voting easier? The likelihood is that, did casting a ballot take even less time than it currently does, more would vote. A small sum of money would be saved in distributing ballots and in administrative costs each election cycle. A quicker turnaround between ticking that all important box, and hearing the results, means a generally more efficient democratic process.

 

However, as with any dramatic reform to tradition, there is opposition. Remote, digital voting, disregards the sacred concept of secrecy in your ballot. Voters are easily traced to their choice. It becomes inherently easier for an apathetic individual to ‘sell’ their vote or give it away to their activist friend, parent or colleague – and as voter fraud potentially soars, the very real risk of outside interference in the electoral process rises with it.

 

Security; that’s where the issue lies. In an independent report into online voting in Estonia (where it has been practiced on a number of occasions) researchers found an alarming potential for cyber attacks. The summary of the report states: “Close inspection of videos published by election officials reveals numerous lapses in the most basic security practices. They appear to show the workers downloading essential software over unsecured Internet connections, typing secret passwords and PINs in full view of the camera, and preparing election software for distribution to the public on insecure personal computers, among other examples.” In short, we are relying wholeheartedly on the professionalism of civil servants and the security services – for whom, whilst undoubtedly up to the task, we would be prescribing a dramatically increased workload.

 

In our current hostile political climate, where accusations fly of Russian interference in both the US and French elections – and the British government has our intelligence services on high alert for cyber threats – we believe remote voting would be a risk too serious to take. Whilst TalkPolitics remains committed to bringing our democracy into the modern day, we believe the integrity of it is too important until we are certain of our cyber security. Progress for the sake of progress is no progress at all.

 

A prescription, then; whilst we certainly shouldn’t discount the potential of remote voting in reducing apathy, and improving our currently dismal voter turnout figures, there are incremental steps that we should be taking first. Coinciding with funding for research into cyber security, TalkPolitics believes that voting, at election time, should be integrated more fully into the day to day schedules of the electorate – so that work and family commitments don’t challenge an individual’s right to cast a ballot. We want the government, and councils, to start placing polling booths in supermarkets and schools, universities and shopping centres; so voting becomes a part of everyday life.

 

The apathy displayed by the turnout figures in our recent local and mayoral elections should have been a wake-up call for government, and opposing parties, that thousands of people are not having their voice heard. Time to change that.

 

 

 

Don’t just take our word for it: for further reading, see –

 

https://estoniaevoting.org/findings/

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236595201_Towards_Remote_Electronic_Voting_Systems

 

http://www.digitaldemocracy.parliament.uk/documents/Open-Up-Digital-Democracy-Report.pdf

Got an idea about reducing apathy? We’d love to hear it. Contact team@talk-politics.com to talk through your policy!


TalkPolitics is proud to be supported by Audible. For 50% off your new membership, click here.

Interviewing Philip Davies MP

Interviewing Philip Davies MP

Politics through the eyes of Philip Davies MP


TalkPolitics is proud to be supported by Audible. For 50% off your new membership, click here.